This judgement thing is very tricky. Judging right from wrong...on what criteria? The Supreme's error is that they are deciding that there is no such thing as an inalienable right, granted from God. Their ruling tacitly supports the notion that all rights are granted by men to themselves, with the help of wise men and women on the court. When Jesus was asked what was the greatest commandment, he went right here. I am God and you are not, serve me (to paraphrase). The reason we need to remove those damn Ten Commandments is that it is too obvious that we are violating them at the level of the state. The "controversial" commandments are the top four, not the adultery and stealing ones, though we culturally equivocate on them as well. This is screwey. The Supreme Court is reinterpreting the founding principles of our country. Shouldn't we have talked about it a little first? The need the justices had to rationalize this is seen by the fact that there were two official opinions (majority and minority) in the five four ruling, but that eight of the nine justices also wrote their own opinions on it, to clarify things. Baloney. The eight written essays are proof that there is no clarity on their interpretation. This is trouble, undoubtedly coming to a courthouse grounds or courtroom foyer near you. The ACLU, I'm sure is ecstatic. Barry Lynn is doing back flips. I'm bummed.